I think the abstinence only sex ed is a disservice to young
people. I think pure positive training
is a disservice to pet owners and pets.
We need to talk about corrections.
We need to accept training in the pure punishment quadrant. MOST IMPORTANT, WE NEED TO TEACH PEOPLE HOW
AND WHEN TO USE CORRECTIONS. Because if
we don’t then someday Fluffy is not going to come when called, or nip the
neighbor’s kid, or jump all over mom who is dressed to go out, and it won’t go
well for Fluffy. Those people who you
lectured at length on the evils of correction are now frustrated with Fluffy,
sure that all correction is abuse, and far more likely to be abusive than if
the proper use of corrections had been discussed and practiced. They’ll correct too hard. Because Fluffy has never been corrected she’ll
see it as a personal attack rather than a result of a behavioral choice. Then the owners will feel guilty and not
correct her the next time. Reinforcements
work on a variable schedule, punishment does not. You need to be consistent, correcting essentially
every time. But Fluffy’s owners don’t
know that. So Fluffy can’t figure out
the pattern and know what to do to avoid the correction. Fluffy’s owners get more frustrated, and
probably correct Fluffy again, harder this time. Why, because their instructor never taught
them that corrections must be consistent, and very seldom need to be
harsh. Their instructor never warned
them that escalation of corrections is not a substitute for consistency of
corrections, and indeed escalating corrections without being consistent is
abusive because Fluffy never figures out exactly what to do to avoid the
corrections. All the instructor ever
said was that corrections are abusive, don’t go there. It doesn’t work for sex ed and it doesn’t
work for dog training.
First, let’s get over this abuse thing. Properly done corrections are not abuse. They are feedback on a behavioral
choice. And if you say that pet owners
won’t correct properly, well whose fault is that? Since the pure positive movement won’t allow
any reasonable discourse on corrections then there is no learning. Corrections are everything from a pop on the
leash, a quick scold to blocking the dog from its goal, etc.
I’m not even sure the pure positive folks even let
themselves learn the basics of correction:
1.
Correction must be consistent, think V1 (if you
really are a positive trainer you should know what that is)
2.
Correction needs to be adjusted so that the dog
thinks about it. For some dogs a hard
word or body block is enough. For a
snarky pup pinning it to the ground until it gives up is appropriate. For a pup that loves to bite and is not
responding to being redirected to toys, scruff it or give it a smack, hard
enough that the dog stops and thinks about it.
The dog should neither run away nor launch back into the behavior.
3.
Sometimes, in the case of interrupting a dog
mentally involved in its behavior (example a keen young dog working stock) you
may need to be fairly harsh to get the dog’s attention. Once you have the dog’s attention you may
need to back way down.
4.
Do not correct when you are angry. Indeed better to nip problem behavior before
you get totally frustrated with it. Many
folks avoid correction, allow the problem behavior to get established, then not
only are they frustrated but the behavior is much more difficult to stop.
5.
You need to be calm and quick when delivering a
correction. No emotion, no
tantrums. Sort of the same as 4, but
very important.
6.
Correct at the moment the dog is bad, then
stop. The dog learns from when you stop
the correction. If you continue to
berate or correct the dog after it has complied then the dog has no chance to
figure out what it is you wanted.
7.
Timing is everything, just like reinforcements.
8.
Use reinforcement when you can. Recognize where correction is a better option
(simple single behavior you want to eliminate) or the only realistic option
(you don’t control the primary reinforcements)
9.
For heaven’s sake when the safety of your dog,
or someone else’s dog, or your cat, or the sheep are at stake don’t stand on
your pure positive pedestal and think you are some almighty savior because you
did not administer an aversive. While
the sheep are terrorized in the corner or the cat is living in the basement you
are responsible. No Pontius Pilate
washing your hands clean for you.
10.
If you don’t control the primary reinforcements
you are not going to solve the problem with positive training. To train with reinforcements you need to be
able to control the dog’s access to those reinforcements. Much more difficult in the real world than
the training class. Yes, superb and
determined positive trainers can proof a behavior extensively so the dog never
thinks about the distraction, but the Jones family is not going to do that with
their Lab. And even that fails when you
are training a dog in something self-reinforcing like working livestock. Yes, you can still use positive reinforcements,
but you will need some form of corrections to keep the work in a zone where you
have something to reinforce.
I’ve seen quite a few trainers who do incorporate corrections
looking for euphemisms to describe corrections.
Let’s not change the word.
Corrections fall into the pure punishment quadrant, nothing wrong with
that. Let’s keep the language clear
rather than coming up with new terms to avoid ruffling the clicker cult.
For those who now picture me training with a whip and chair,
I have lots of clickers. I train with
clickers. I went to “chicken camp” with
Bob and Marian Bailey and loved it. I
had a great conversation with Bob Bailey about the challenges of training in a
self-reinforcing environment. I love
training with positive reinforcement. I’ve
brought in a clinician for a clicker seminar I put together. I’ve gone to other clicker seminars,
including travelling quite a ways to attend.
I put lots of agility titles on dogs using positive reinforcement and my
trusty clickers back when I was doing agility.
But these dogs did get corrections for certain life behaviors. I live on a busy road. Dive past me to get out the front gate and
you will be corrected, every single time.
My dogs work stock. I don’t
control all the reinforcements. I use
corrections to keep the work in a zone that can be reinforced. I used to foster retired racing greyhounds. I have cats.
Those dogs wore a muzzle and were kept on a leash when they came in my
house. They were corrected for any
intent on the cat, corrected hard for trying to go after it. Within a day or two a cat would walk in the
room and the dog would look away…click/treat/praise. Several of these dogs who were quite
aggressive with cats were able to be placed in homes with cats and live in
peace together.